Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
User avatar
By nuts Mon Oct 11, 2010 8:03 pm
Hi i don't know how it is supposed to act but when i compress a sound i only get a higher pitched sample..
I don't get nastier sounds or anything like that.

Since i only have highly pitched sounds I tried to lowered the pitch in Edit Sound menu but it was impossible to do.


Can you tell me if something is wrong with me, or my 3.50 ?

Thanks
User avatar
By The Grublet Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:53 am
I thought they meant bit compression.


(reducing the size of the sample)

"?"
By mpc3000le Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:58 am
nuts wrote:Can you tell me if something is wrong with me, or my 3.50 ?


It is you :lol:

The compression function is a sample rate reduction system.

Identical to the function on the MPC60.

The way it works ?

Original sample word locations:

1, 2, 3, 4 ,5 ,6 ,7, 8.

After compression:

1, 3, 5, 7.

IE: Half the samples. Hence a doubling in pitch.

Per the MPC60 manual for explanatory purposes.

The new Sound Compression feature squeezes any sound into ½ the memory space, at the expense of lower treble fidelity.

If all sounds in memory are compressed, this effectively doubles available sound memory.

The selected sound’s tuning is displayed in the TUNE field.

(This is the same parameter as in the EDIT SOUND screen.)

During the compression process, 120 is subtracted from the tuning in order to
compensate for the faster play of the smaller sound.

Since -120 is the lowest possible tuning, compression is only permitted on sounds with a
tuning of 0 or greater.

If your sound’s tuning is below 0, you must retune it to 0 before compressing.

After compression, save the sound to disk.

It’s a good idea to save it to a different file than the original uncompressed sound.

That way, you have the option of loading either the normal or compressed version of the
sound as needed.

If you are still stuck then ask again and I am sure one of the other users who uses this function regularly may reply with their own usage examples.

Thanks,

Rohan.
User avatar
By nuts Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:53 pm
Thanks, glad the sickness's in me. :P

I understand for the pitch now, i probably just expected something more obvious in the dirtyness department.
I have some bad references i guess, as an Emax- S950 - S760 user.
By jazzroom Wed Nov 10, 2010 12:18 am
Just by reading this thread i got really curious about the
sound of the compressed versus clean sound
with the Vailixi OS,
anyone could post some samples sound comparisons?
By Ldizzy Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:09 am
^ id be very intrigued as well...

my mp is currently at forat's and im wondering about the pertinence of adding jjos to it... it would cut a hole in my budget but Rohan has been of a great help lately for me... its something i wish to try, it has good karma ahahah

anyone could post an example?
By Ldizzy Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:03 am
Ldizzy wrote:^ id be very intrigued as well...

my mp is currently at forat's and im wondering about the pertinence of adding jjos to it... it would cut a hole in my budget but Rohan has been of a great help lately for me... its something i wish to try, it has good karma ahahah

anyone could post an example?


oops vailixi i meant ! thx anton :P